PDA

View Full Version : National Guard: Gay Iraq veteran must leave service


UNODRAGONE
07-01-2009, 08:00 AM
I am a proud veteran but to be honest I have always been ashamed of how the military treats gay/lesbian personal. I am curious on this particular piece:

Fulton said that while Obama can't change the law himself, he could sign an executive order halting discharges while the policy is under review
I have tried to research further into this and was wondering if anyone knows if that is true? This remark:
"It's not for me to tell you to be patient any more than it was for others to counsel patience to African-Americans who were petitioning for equal rights a half-century ago," Obama said. annoys me.


http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/06/30/us.military.gays/index.html

(CNN) -- A panel of New York National Guard officers has recommended that an Iraq war veteran who acknowledged his homosexuality must leave the service, his supporters said Tuesday.


First Lt. Dan Choi, shown at a gay protest rally in May in California, disclosed in March that he was gay.

1 of 2 First Lt. Dan Choi disclosed in March that he is gay, challenging the 1994 "don't ask, don't tell" law that requires the military to discharge troops who disclose their sexual orientation. Tuesday's ruling, made after a daylong hearing, is a step toward stripping Choi of his officer's commission and ending his career.

"It's disappointing, but not unexpected," said Sue Fulton, a spokeswoman for Knights Out, a group of gay and lesbian West Point alumni Choi helped found.

Fulton said the Guard's Federal Recognition Board heard from members of Choi's unit, his commanding officer and fellow soldiers who served in Iraq, and reviewed more than 150 letters of support for Choi, a 2003 West Point graduate and an Arab linguist.

"At the end of the day, they did not consider any of that material [to] whether he was a good soldier," she said. "It was solely about whether he said he was gay."

The closed-door hearing began Tuesday morning before the board, which certifies that Guard officers meet the standards of the regular Army. Its decision came after several hours of deliberation Tuesday afternoon.

The hearing is considered a confidential personnel matter, and the service won't comment on the results, said Lt. Col. Paul Fanning, a National Guard spokesman.

The board's recommendation must be approved by the commander of the U.S. 1st Army, which oversees the National Guard and Army Reserve. But Choi's public declaration is "a finding of fact that the board has to deal with," Fanning said.

"The Army has no choice but to follow through with that," he said.

More than 12,500 gays have been forced to leave the military since "don't ask, don't tell" went into effect -- including dozens of Arabic speakers, people highly valued by the military since the invasion of Iraq.

Choi transferred from the active-duty Army to the National Guard in June 2008, Fanning said. He served as an infantry platoon leader in Iraq in 2006 and 2007 and, like many soldiers, had his yearlong tour of duty extended by three months.

Choi served as celebrity grand marshal of the San Francisco, California, Gay Pride Parade over the weekend. He told CNN's "American Morning" on Monday that he is acting on "the lessons that I learned at West Point -- honesty and courage and integrity."

"It's an informed decision," he said. "But more important than the consequences, more important than punishments or those fears that we might have, we take courage and we take those things very seriously of the values that we were taught. And it's more important that we be honest with ourselves, we have integrity, and we have courage."

President Obama campaigned on a pledge to repeal "don't ask, don't tell" and has been criticized for not moving faster on that goal since taking office in January. He told gay-rights advocates at a Monday night reception at the White House that his administration is already working with House and Senate members to get the law changed.

"It's not for me to tell you to be patient any more than it was for others to counsel patience to African-Americans who were petitioning for equal rights a half-century ago," Obama said. But he added, "I do have a responsibility to see that this change is administered in a practical -- and a way that takes over the long term."

Fulton said that while Obama can't change the law himself, he could sign an executive order halting discharges while the policy is under review

Klark
07-01-2009, 09:16 AM
1 of 2 First Lt. Dan Choi disclosed in March that he is gay, challenging the 1994 "don't ask, don't tell" law that requires the military to discharge troops who disclose their sexual orientation.

Based on that statement, I would assume that any troop who makes the statement that they are straight also need to be discharged.

What that story fails to bring to light with that paragraph is that it's not just a discharge of troops who disclose their sexual orientation. It's only for gays or lesbians who disclose their sexual orientation.

In the military, you are straight until proven gay.

Ves
07-01-2009, 10:10 AM
Based on that statement, I would assume that any troop who makes the statement that they are straight also need to be discharged.
Funnily enough that's almost word for word what I thought when I read that paragraph.

Once again we fail to learn from history. In Sparta - arguably among the best armies of the ancient world, homosexuality was actively encouraged among the rank and file troops as it created a stronger bond between them.
Amusingly I once mentioned this to a gay friend of mine, and he replied that the real reason was that they were hoping these troops would scratch the enemy's eyes out for having more fabulous uniforms. He has a... unique grasp of history I feel. :D

wolfmanlima
09-01-2009, 03:53 PM
personally, i think the u.s army has a thing or two to learn in how to deal with this. dont worry though, the dutch army has also some other things to learn.

in the dutch army you wont get fired if you come clear to be gay or lesbian. in fact, our army even spends money on meetings for men and women with other sexual preferences.

personally, i think its the right thing to just accept them. like their sexual orientation has anything to do with their ability to do her or his job.

but, as most propably agree with me with experience in the army. its more or less an macho-culture. gay or lesbian is seen as an "flaw" or weakness in some millitary circles that are more driven on violent situations. i have seen it at least in my unit.

i think some army's must realise its the 21st century and must put some old dusty generals with retirement.