View Full Version : New Bigfoot Pics....
The Creeper
10-24-2007, 01:51 AM
http://www.bfro.net/avevid/jacobs/2_creature_med.jpg
Copyright © 2007 BFRO.net
This picture has been heating up the net. It's a picture of a supposed young Sasquatch in Northwest Pennsylvania.
BFRO is all over this. Apparently it's been taken with a camera that has 30 sec intravals so more pictures are soon to come or so I hear.
Take a look at the link and lemme know what you guys think.
http://www.bfro.net/avevid/jacobs/jacobs_photos.asp
UNODRAGONE
10-24-2007, 07:11 AM
looking at the photo, the position of the legs to the body and what not, it looks like a human dressed up as bigfoot to me :shrug:
Tempest
10-24-2007, 09:06 PM
looking at the photo, the position of the legs to the body and what not, it looks like a human dressed up as bigfoot to me :shrug:
Yes it does look very human, but it's still one of the most convincing photos of Bigfoot (or any legendary creature for that matter) that I've seen.
LakeSider
10-24-2007, 10:42 PM
yes not quite as blurry as most but still could be anything not a chimp since their legs are cosiderably shorter than the whatever in this pic, can't wait to see new pics
Rainstorm
10-25-2007, 01:37 AM
Looks like the frickin thing is doing yoga in the second pic through the link. LOL!
Very interesting. Wish they had gotten some face shots.
Canis Lupus
10-25-2007, 06:56 AM
OK, who has lost his pet monkey?
Faolan
10-25-2007, 07:08 PM
Careful now, someone here might say that "Oh-nos, I gots myself caught on camera. But see told you i'm a tr00 w3r3!".
But seriously, bigfoot? Personaly that might infact be an escaped monkey as Canis joked about...
Cheater388
10-25-2007, 08:09 PM
Previously, there wasn't much proof of a Bigfoot. The picture "proof" was either analyzed to be not so proof-full or ignored, making people say "let's get back to this later." As well ,most people will not believe something that has not been explained yet; Think of werewolves, dragons, Locke-nes Monster, and smart animals (people are mostly pompous and egotistical and naive, so nobody believes in smart animals like I do... :D).
What you are telling me is that these are pictures (with a "control" [as in a control in an experiment]) are of something new or Bigfoot. Something new or Bigfoot: something that has been avoiding scientific discovery from the beginning of time till now. The odds of that are, sorry to say, unbelievable.
Personally, I need more proof of this. May someone please find one of these dead in a forest, kill one or get one into captivity so that it can be examined?
I need to read the information that comes with the text, so I'll get back to this thread later.
Nichael
10-25-2007, 08:12 PM
Not a monkey. Monkeys have tails. Some sort of ape; I could see that. The legs seem a bit short for a human's, though their thickness seems about the same. The arms are definitely on the long side.
Hair seems a bit... I don't know, smooth for an ape costume. Usually on those outfits it looks a lot more fuzzy and not all growing in the same direction like natural hair should.
I don't know what to make of this, other than it looks like a big chimpanzee.
Canis Lupus
10-31-2007, 02:10 PM
Finally, I know the difference between monkeys and apes. :D
I only knew apes was a "bigger" term. Never really looked into it.
oconeecock
07-03-2008, 09:53 PM
It's a skinny bear - not an uncommon sight.
Lanky yes - but just a bear
punxnotdead
07-03-2008, 09:58 PM
Bigfoot doesn't walk on all fours, does he?
I think it's all a sham.
dwulf
07-16-2008, 06:20 PM
Dude in a suit if you ask me.
RPulfer
07-19-2008, 01:13 PM
Dude in a suit if you ask me.
I'd love to believe in Bigfoot - in fact, I do, but I don't know what is and isn't in that picture - but didn't they find out one of the major BF sightings was some sort of hoax a couple years back? Anyone know what I'm talking about?
vBulletin® v3.6.5, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.