PDA

View Full Version : Who would you want to be your qb with 2 minutes left in a game?


Lord Anubis
01-17-2005, 07:07 PM
1. Michael Vick

2. Donavon McNabb

3. Tom Brady

4. Ben Roethlisberger

West
01-17-2005, 08:26 PM
Hasselbeck should be an option.

Lord Anubis
01-17-2005, 08:27 PM
Hawks fan i'm guessing....lol

West
01-17-2005, 08:28 PM
Yes. Yes I am.

..You know what I just realized? We will probably be the only two people who post on this thread. :D

Lord Anubis
01-17-2005, 08:45 PM
i'm hoping more get involved.

Gilenea
01-17-2005, 10:24 PM
This was fixed.

Ender wasn't on the list.

Gil

Darth Cluich
01-18-2005, 10:06 AM
You know what I just realized? We will probably be the only two people who post on this thread. :D

Wrong! I'll probably be posting in this forum quite a bit. As for the question at hand, despite being an Eagles fan, I'd have to say Brady. He's the best QB I've seen since Montana. Time will tell, of course (he's still relatively young), but he may even be better.

EDIT: Just a suggestion, but you might want to make this into a proper poll.

Thanatos
01-18-2005, 11:44 AM
I agree w/Cluich on the Brady/Montana thing, Brady just doesnt lose in postseason.. however... Vick is my fav QB so ill go w/him.

Darth Cluich
01-18-2005, 12:30 PM
Actually, one could argue that Brady is better than Montana, based on the other players around him. With the exception of Corey Dillon -- and that's only this year -- Brady's never had the kind of players around him that Montana had: no Jerry Rice, no Roger Craig, no Dwight Clark, no players of that calliber.

Lord Anubis
01-18-2005, 03:04 PM
I'd like Tom Brady's brain inside of Donovon McNabb's head!!!

Darth Cluich
01-18-2005, 03:16 PM
I'd like Tom Brady's brain inside of Donovon McNabb's head!!!

Ooooh...that'd be sweeeeeeeet....

Reformer56
01-18-2005, 09:44 PM
If I had to pick a current QB I'd go with Vick, you just can't defend him on that bootled or Play Action or Draw...

Older QB I'd go with Brett Farve around '95 or Johnny Unitas.

And If I could do a hybrid...I'd get Vick's running skills, with Farve's accuracy with the quick thinking of Brady.

EDIT: Spelling

Thanatos
01-19-2005, 08:52 AM
Actually, one could argue that Brady is better than Montana, based on the other players around him. With the exception of Corey Dillon -- and that's only this year -- Brady's never had the kind of players around him that Montana had: no Jerry Rice, no Roger Craig, no Dwight Clark, no players of that calliber.


Well, Montana is still the best, early on he didnt have Jerry Rice or the other guys. & they still won a superbowl & he was still playing close to perfection.

Also cant forget late in his career when he played for KC & led that team to the championship game.

That team had no one aside from Derrick Thomas. He took em to the game before the superbowl. If the OL wouldve held help.... KC wins that game easily.

I can still remember that game.


Montana has that "thing" where he makes everyone look good.. sort of like Jordan. Precision passing.. its beautiful. all his passes were too perfect, right on the money.

thats my opinion ;)

Lord Anubis
01-19-2005, 09:42 AM
Great players tend to bring up others around them to a higher playing level.

Course my Eagles do have the people's champ!....lol

Reformer56
01-19-2005, 06:24 PM
Well in the situation of the Patriots you have great team chemistry. It's not about having the all star players take a look at Denver or Green Bay for example. Denever brought in the all star Corner Champ Bailey (sp?) and they didn't get any further this year than last year. In the situation of the Packers Mike Sherman fired the former defensive cordinator and brought in Bob Slowik and their defnese actually went futher down than it did last year. It's all about team chemistry in the NFL now. And if you can get a group of players that like eachother and play well together than they will thrive off of each other and the New England Patriots are a prime example of this.